tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post6048552797650826030..comments2024-03-27T21:54:31.247-07:00Comments on Web Series Today: Rewriting History: IAWTV Stylemodelmotionhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12005411582406219607noreply@blogger.comBlogger29125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-50792219903186420332010-12-25T22:42:19.335-08:002010-12-25T22:42:19.335-08:00The whole considered intercontinental propensity t...The whole considered intercontinental propensity to consolidation in justifiable all, idiolect<br />included, there is a dignified of the utmost account on studying English nought in those parts of the humankind, where English is not a compelling language. This conclusion leads us that there is elephantine assertion pro the treatment of English-speaking tutors, who are specializing in teaching English. South Korea is remote of most expropriate countries in terms of community upgrade, which means teaching English in Korea would be incomparably profitable. <br /><br /><a href="http://acecostanalyzer.com" rel="nofollow">click here</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-20229281977790380162010-05-17T16:04:21.847-07:002010-05-17T16:04:21.847-07:00436 never sleeps, NEVER! So don't think about...436 never sleeps, NEVER! So don't think about putting it to bed.Joenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-87886344663660700192010-05-17T13:23:04.701-07:002010-05-17T13:23:04.701-07:00When we talk of conflict of interest we are talkin...When we talk of conflict of interest we are talking about 5 individuals from one commercial company who all have seats on the Board of Directors of a non profit that is supposed to be independent and represent the World wide community of individuals involved with web series. I would say that substantially different from anyone expressing an opinion, but in the end the decision is up to you. Your posts and input are always welcome and appreciated here.<br /><br />In regard to the IAWTV I would hope the Tubefilter guys would simply make the right decision here. Drew started the process by accepting full responsibIlity on behalf of Tubefilter/Streamys LCC. What we need now is for that process to be completed with changes to the Board of Directors of the IAWTV. What I am trying to point out is that these changes to the Board of Directors should represent a beginning, not an end point. Get the foundation right before you start to build. And, that foundation is the Board of Directors of the IAWTV.modelmotionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12005411582406219607noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-56054321691066888592010-05-17T13:07:05.227-07:002010-05-17T13:07:05.227-07:00I am absolutely still an author here. Though don&...I am absolutely still an author here. Though don't you feel as if me posting my personal opinions here will lead to the exact type of "Conflict of Interest" that we are trying to say we have a problem with? I am a member of the IAWTV and a writer for Tubefilter afterall. <br /><br />I honestly am not sure what is appropriate and what isn't, I'm just trying to maneuver through this the best I can. I have always felt community is more important than anything but I also believe in the IAWTV and enjoy my work on Tubefilter.<br /><br />All I can say is I'm listening and I care.JenniPowellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10114880420953336529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-63131445283742863712010-05-17T11:54:40.680-07:002010-05-17T11:54:40.680-07:00In the last two articles I have called for members...In the last two articles I have called for members of the Board of the IAWTV to step down . Previously I have also suggested a conflict of interest between Tubefilter and the IAWTV however I left it up to the membership of the IAWTV to handle. <br /><br />I patiently waited and tried to study as many opinions as were publicly posted. I waited for the LA town hall meeting. In the end I came to the conclusion that it was time to express an opinion that was more critical of what many have perceived to be one of the core problems.<br /><br />The results so far from the membership of the IAWTV are less than productive and if anything the draw bridge has been raised on the open discussions. The default option on Vanilla, the software used on the IAWTV discussion board is to have it fully viewable yet they choose to deliberately close it off to the rest of the World. That is their option, but they cannot expect the rest of the web series community to just sit back and let this "elite group" determine the fate of the IAWTV and thereby an award show that has the potential to either benefit or gravely hurt the future financing of web series around the World.<br /><br />Asking for people to step down is not something I take lightly. The Tubefilter guys have done a lot and built up a nice little franchise. That is something I give them full credit for.<br /><br />However in terms of the IAWTV/award show there is a problem and there is really only one solution and that is for the membership of the IAWTV to take control of the IAWTV and run it in a way that benefits the entire World Wide Web series community, not just select interest groups.<br /><br />It may seem harsh. It may seem unappreciative of all the Tubefilter guys have done. However I believe it needs to be done if we are going to move forward. You simply cannot build something on a foundation that is not appropriate. Fix the foundation and then we can begin to start rebuilding.modelmotionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12005411582406219607noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-24600104374905873992010-05-17T11:17:23.450-07:002010-05-17T11:17:23.450-07:00I never insinuated that you insinuated. No one was...I never insinuated that you insinuated. No one was insinuated. <br /><br />Also, I happen to think we have been very fair in our coverage of the Streamys, the IAWTV, and the ancillary stories and activities. Personally, when the Rebuild the Trust site was launched, I was very careful to layout exactly what they were going for without jumping to conclusions. Likewise, I thought I was very restrained in my article on Streamygate. <br /><br />Similarly, as far as I can tell I'm one of the few people outside of Tubefilter's circle who hasn't called for the end of the Streamys, the removal of their ownership, or that they commit Seppuku for the Streamy debacle. <br /><br />However, like Jenni said people should look around to other sites for information, just remember to come back here when you are done. :)Mathieashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08106937744918642611noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-71847200008590654002010-05-17T11:15:17.571-07:002010-05-17T11:15:17.571-07:00Copyright rules prevent us from using more than a ...Copyright rules prevent us from using more than a short blurb from articles from other sites however we do make every effort to ensure that all opinions are conveyed here by linking articles from all positions.<br /><br />Jenni you are still an "author" here so if you have an opinion that you feel needs to be represented here to provide balance please feel free to do so.<br /><br />The fact is that we need change and we need it fast. Even the New Mediocracy podcast was quite critical of what happened at the town hall meeting. <br /><br />If the membership of the IAWTV does not agree with the opinions expressed in this post or wants to go a different direction then so be it, but remember the membership of the IAWTV is now fully responsible for what happens in the future and will be held accountable by the larger web series community.modelmotionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12005411582406219607noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-62334570209463343792010-05-17T11:00:53.865-07:002010-05-17T11:00:53.865-07:00I specifically said I think it is a valuable thing...I specifically said I think it is a valuable thing that criticism be given. It is often constructive and very necessary. I just pointed out that there are other points of view out there as well.<br /><br />And absolutely, modelmotion does link to Tubefilter articles, I never insinuated he didn't. But his and other authors on the sites full articles not hidden behind a link are naturally easier to read then taking the time to click on a link to an outside site. So the personal opinions of the authors of this blog are the most prominently viewed here.<br /><br />Again, that is totally not a bad thing, in fact that is how it should be. But when someone says "I only get my views of Tubefilter here", it is prudent to point out that there are other points of view out there. I tend to encourage people to gather all the information they can, as that's how I tend to do things.<br /><br />In the end, everyone is entitled to their own opinions.JenniPowellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10114880420953336529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-30876698748252384542010-05-17T10:41:01.256-07:002010-05-17T10:41:01.256-07:00This site is critical of Tubefilter? Modelmotion r...This site is critical of Tubefilter? Modelmotion reposts links to every damn story they've ever written. <br /><br />And yes the whole 436 article was kinda silly, maybe its time to put that particular meme to bed, but it is a valid point, the IAWTV is controlled by a single group, a group who's interest may not always align with the greater online video community. <br /><br />Furthermore, with the IAWTV retreating behinds its walled off garden to discuss the future of 'web TV' it in and of itself is creating a rift, a rift between IAWTV members and non-members. The more exclusive they become the less relevant they become.<br /><br />Again this is an industry that lacks sustainable revenue, viewership is at an all time low, and there isn't even a consensus as to what constitutes a webseries. Sometimes it feels like they are fighting over who gets to be in charge of the Titanic.Mathieashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08106937744918642611noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-10017517357420578622010-05-17T04:25:39.141-07:002010-05-17T04:25:39.141-07:00Credit has always been given to Tubefilter for wha...Credit has always been given to Tubefilter for what they have done. It takes a lot to start a company and no one has questioned that the Tubefilter guys have been able to build their franchise and contribute to web series. <br /><br />What has been questioned is the way in which they tried to extend their franchise in a way that would exploit the use of a supposedly independent body called the IAWTV. So while the Tubefilter guys contributions to web series has not been questioned their lack of judgement in regard to this particular issue has. <br /><br />Also it should be pointed out that this blog has linked to most of the other relevant articles from others in the community so the reader can make up their own mind.modelmotionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12005411582406219607noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-72662049057527599482010-05-17T02:09:24.892-07:002010-05-17T02:09:24.892-07:00Because they HAVE done a good job in the past. Pe...Because they HAVE done a good job in the past. People tend to focus on people's mistakes and not their triumphs, and such is the case here. Tubefilter has always been at the forefront of supporting this burgeoning industry and those of us who know the "Tubefilter guys", as they are called, know they are passionate and give 24 hours a day to furthering this industry. But they are still human and as such, mistakes have been made both by the IAWTV and Tubefilter. But both are owning up to those mistakes and trying to work to make things better. Perhaps not to the speed everyone is comfortable with, but still.<br /><br />If you are only getting your information about these organizations from this blog, which is historically very critical of both Tubefilter and the IAWTV, then you are only getting one point of view. And let me be clear, it's not a BAD point of view, as criticism is very important when it comes to growing and learning. But still, only having one avenue of information doesn't lead to the most informed of decisions.JenniPowellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10114880420953336529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-31938942256328720702010-05-16T19:52:17.602-07:002010-05-16T19:52:17.602-07:00Just out of curiosity. But why not just have noth...Just out of curiosity. But why not just have nothing to do with IAWTV and Tubefilter? It looks like they're not doing a good job. And while all I know about them is on this site, I haven't read anything about either that would make working with them worthwhile. So why don't all the people who make web series just stop doing anything with them?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-48572528591064225732010-05-16T19:23:48.162-07:002010-05-16T19:23:48.162-07:00A valid an constructive solution was in fact inclu...A valid an constructive solution was in fact included in the article.modelmotionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12005411582406219607noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-12912738261945986342010-05-16T18:39:45.942-07:002010-05-16T18:39:45.942-07:00Hi all,
Just wanted to address a number of issues...Hi all,<br /><br />Just wanted to address a number of issues. <br /><br />First, it seems to be a bit of a misunderstanding combined with the continued technical glitches that seem to plague the academy site.<br /><br />Looking at the "replaced" letter url, you see it leads to a flat file whose name is the date of the letter. Given that a lot of the IAWTV is (unfortunately) still done by hand, they uploaded the file, shifted the links, and didn't think of the consequences.<br /><br />I pinged Michael and Brady and they confirmed my suspicions. They will be following up on my suggestion of setting up an "archive" page for older letters. And don't worry; I'm all about lighting a fire on their ass.<br /><br />Second, the "exclusivity" of access of the forum and the larger of who gets to be a member. The latter is a subject of active discussion on the forums; everyone recognizes there is a problem tied into limited resources, as are most problem. As to gaining access to the forums, a number of us have formed a volunteer technical commitee to help the academy get there. We have other issues on our plate, namely a Wiki, and setting up a livestreaming weekly meeting.<br /><br />Finally, on "sieging the castle" and demanding immediate elections. I do agree, having a governing body should be a top priority. But I came out of the Wednesday meeting feeling hopeful and excited about the future of this academy, and an "us" vs "them" (vs "other thems" vs etc) attitude is only a step back. A number of us are giving our time and resources to resolve these issues; its been three days but we ARE seeing movement and responsiveness.<br /><br />So reach out and offer aid. If in a month, nothing has changed, I'll be at the head of the crowd screaming bloody murder ESPECIALLy after offering to volunteer. But right now, let's stop looking for controversies and start looking for solutions.<br /><br />CheersRudy Jahchanhtp://rudyjahchan.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-25010706607063491672010-05-16T17:14:47.351-07:002010-05-16T17:14:47.351-07:00I for one would like to know what the criteria and...I for one would like to know what the criteria and qualifications are for membership. <br /><br />Also, how many members they are looking to have and what the composition of the membership is that they are looking for.Mathieashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08106937744918642611noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-15456520752353830242010-05-16T15:38:37.824-07:002010-05-16T15:38:37.824-07:00Anthony: that was the membership committee from th...Anthony: that was the membership committee from this last round of acceptances. It is already in discussion to have the members of the next membership committee be voted on and the admission system be made more clear before additional acceptances happen.<br /><br />Also, the references section is being considered to be expanded upon, since currently there is no place for a statement of reference to be included.<br /><br />Another thing discussed is a longer admission period so that the membership committee has ample time to review applications, personally contact references, etc.JenniPowellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10114880420953336529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-9268998827077719382010-05-16T13:06:16.351-07:002010-05-16T13:06:16.351-07:00Looks like a membership committee has already been...Looks like a membership committee has already been established: http://www.iawtv.org/committee/membership.shtmlAnthonyDehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02734167179809273749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-25183113168783029972010-05-16T11:02:16.917-07:002010-05-16T11:02:16.917-07:00I nominate Jenni Powell to be the new chairperson....I nominate Jenni Powell to be the new chairperson. <br /><br />I also purpose that the chairperson be given a weekly cheese stipend and either a scepter (preferably one similar to the one in <i>The Last Starfighter</i> and or a pet Zebra.Mathieashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08106937744918642611noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-82830409593287497382010-05-16T08:27:35.050-07:002010-05-16T08:27:35.050-07:00Before you can send out proxy ballots you clearly ...Before you can send out proxy ballots you clearly have to identify who the candidates are. The entire process is going to take time and the sooner the membership decide to work on it the better. The process would probably be speeded up if at least a couple of existing board members were on board with the initiative to call a special election.<br /><br />One has to first evaluate the bylaws which outline the terms of special meetings and also votes without meetings. <br /><br />There are a lot of very accomplished individuals in this community and there is little doubt that given the opportunity and support of both the core membership and the community at large a number of great candidates would come forward to run for a new Board that was committed to being truly independent and representative of the web series community.<br /><br />There is a need to recognize here that immediate change is within the reach of the membership of the IAWTV if they so choose. The longer they wait the more difficult it may become.modelmotionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12005411582406219607noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-26759744620110004392010-05-16T07:50:26.298-07:002010-05-16T07:50:26.298-07:00A call for an election should not be considered un...A call for an election should not be considered until viable new leaders have been identified or stepped forward or else we wind up in the exact same situation we are now. The current board had their responsibilities bestowed upon them by a small number of people...the new board members have to gain the acceptance of over 200 of their peers.<br /><br />Everyone appears to be a bit trigger-shy at the moment. Everyone is aware there is a problem but there is a fear of creating an even larger problem should action be taken prematurely.<br /><br />As far as the membership appeals are concerned, again, a viable Membership Committee with the people power to respond personally to such appeals needs to be in place in order to serve those requests.<br /><br />By the way, I think these things are absolutely within the IAWTV's power to make happen.JenniPowellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10114880420953336529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-71156624242809359972010-05-16T01:26:12.294-07:002010-05-16T01:26:12.294-07:00In regard to the proposed Board of Governors (as o...In regard to the proposed Board of Governors (as opposed to the Board of Directors):<br /><br />ARTICLE IX BOARD OF GOVERNORS<br />Section 1. Purpose Of The Board Of Governors.<br /><br />The purpose of the Board of Governors shall be to serve the Board in an advisory capacity. The Board of Governors shall have no authority of, or responsibility for, supervision, direction or control of the business and affairs of the Corporation and cannot vote on Board matters (except to the extent required in connection with fulfilling a role as a member of a Committee or Sub-Committee, if at all).modelmotionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12005411582406219607noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-4117366116720833772010-05-16T00:46:43.551-07:002010-05-16T00:46:43.551-07:00Here is a link to the Bylaws that were referred to...Here is a link to the Bylaws that were referred to above:<br /><br />http://www.iawtv.org/files/IAWTV-Bylaws-12-1-09.pdfmodelmotionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12005411582406219607noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-85341253530420295272010-05-15T22:34:39.572-07:002010-05-15T22:34:39.572-07:00I'm really not sure why they couldn't make...I'm really not sure why they couldn't make known at this meeting what the qualifications to be a member are/were. Having checked out the bylaws, it definitely looks to me like they worked backwards to explain why certain people were accepted. There are regular voting members, non-voting company members, honorary members, emeritus members and affiliated members. Honorary membership seems to be a catch all. modelmotion probably would qualify for honorary membership as it is defined there. I wonder if the current membership received notification of their classifications yet? So it provides an excuse why they accepted some people but not why others were rejected.<br /><br />If the IAWTV wants a do-over the least they can do is install an appeal process for the perspective members who were rejected without explanation prior to the creation of membership classifications.AnthonyDehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02734167179809273749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-5930500498493982292010-05-15T22:25:37.359-07:002010-05-15T22:25:37.359-07:00Yes, that is correct the product is called Filterb...Yes, that is correct the product is called Filterbase as we previously reported so that was a "typo" in the comment.<br /><br />The suggested "Wayne-Felicia" coalition was based purely on community speculation. Wayne openly expressed his discontent and a tweet from Felicia seemed to suggest that she might have been less than thrilled with "Rebuild The Trust". That let to the speculation about the alliance. It might also have been based on a bit of wishful thinking since Felicia is so highly regarded in the community and her opinion is highly valued.<br /><br />So as stated in the article "What had been assumed by many in the community to be a struggle between a Wayne-Felicia coalition and the "Tubefilter guys" was an assumption.<br /><br />The fact that such a coalition never materialized at the meeting and that Wayne appears to have reached a compromise with the TF guys makes it hard to know exactly what the internal dynamics were within the the IAWTV. <br /> <br />To find out Felicia stated public position after the town hall meeting it is a good idea to refer to her own words:<br /><br />http://feliciaday.com/blog/iawtvmodelmotionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12005411582406219607noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2754228927937283278.post-81488826940280232882010-05-15T21:41:24.533-07:002010-05-15T21:41:24.533-07:00Two quick corrections:
"...be a struggle bet...Two quick corrections:<br /><br />"...be a struggle between a Wayne-Felicia coalition and the "Tubefilter guys"..."<br />To my knowledge based on discussions with people close to the situation, Felicia was never involved in that particular event. <br /><br />Also, less importantly, Tubefilter's upcoming product has been identified as "filterbase", not "tubebase" (MM's comment)<br /><br />-JeffJeff Koenighttp://broadcastassassin.tumblr.comnoreply@blogger.com